Arthroscopic versus Open Distal Hemitrapeziectomy without Interposition: 2-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Distal hemitrapeziectomy is suggested as an alternative for total trapeziectomy for carpometacarpal thumb joint osteoarthritis, when the scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal joint is unaffected. This can be performed as an arthroscopic or open procedure, with suggested advantages for the less invasive arthroscopic technique. To determine which technique has better outcome on subjective and objective measures, the authors performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Methods: The authors randomized 90 thumbs in the open (n = 45) and arthroscopic (n = 45) groups and evaluated results preoperatively and at 3-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. The primary outcome was the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) to assess pain and function. Also, the authors evaluated pinch, grip, and range of motion, together with return to work, satisfaction, and complications. Results: Full follow-up was obtained in 62 thumbs (open group, n = 32; arthroscopic group, n = 30). For both groups, the PRWHE improved from preoperatively to 12- and 24-month follow-up. Also, grip power, key pinch, and tip pinch improved at final follow-up for both groups. Between groups, there were no clinically important differences between PRWHE, power of grip or pinch, and range of motion. Operation time was shorter for the open group; also, return to work was slightly shorter after open surgery. Satisfaction was comparable between groups. Conclusions: This study shows good functional improvement and pain reduction obtained with a hemitrapeziectomy. No arthroscopic benefits could be substantiated in the results. Because of shorter operation time for the open procedure, and because of equal outcomes compared to the arthroscopic technique, we prefer open hemitrapeziectomy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.