Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With High-Grade Intraepithelial Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation

Author:

Norman Robert D.1,Garg Harshit1ORCID,Rickborn Lanette1,Kaushik Dharam1,Pruthi Deepak Kumar1,Mansour Ahmed M.1,Thompson Ian M.2,Liss Michael A.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, the University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Texas

2. CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Hospital, San Antonio, Texas

3. South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, Texas

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical management of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) and High-Grade Prostate Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN) varies significantly. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence and natural history of ASAP and HGPIN lesions to optimize follow-up strategies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients at a VA Medical Center who underwent a prostate needle biopsy between 1988 and 2017 was performed. The pathological lesions were grouped as ASAP, HGPIN, and ASAP & HGPIN. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as grade group ≥2 prostate cancer. Results: Of 6104 patients screened, 312 patients included having ASAP (n = 70, 1.1%), HGPIN (n = 222, 3.6%), or ASAP & HGPIN (n = 20, 0.3%). Follow-up biopsy was performed in 99.3% of patients. The incidence of prostate cancer in ASAP, HGPIN, or ASAP & HGPIN groups was 46.3%, 37%, and 68.4%, respectively (P = .03). However, the rate of csPCa was similar across the 3 groups (10.1% in ASAP, 10.3% in HGPIN, and 10.5% in ASAP & HGPIN, P = .6). The median time to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients with ASAP (2.8 years for ASAP, 4.9 years for HGPIN, and 1.5 years for ASAP & HGPIN, P = .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to diagnosis of csPCa between the various groups (P = .7). Conclusion: Both ASAP and HGPIN have a low risk of progression to csPCa. This, coupled with a prolonged time to any cancer diagnosis, suggests that immediate repeat biopsy might not be necessary among these patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3