Physician Perspectives on the Nonclinical Factors That Contribute to Decision-Making for Advanced Prostate Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study

Author:

Kaye Deborah R.1234,Tu Karissa5ORCID,Davis J. Kelly6ORCID,Campagna Ada6,Docherty Sharron L.7,Kurnot Jeremy1,Zhang Tian8,George Daniel J.39,Ubel Peter A.26

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

2. Duke-Margolis Center for Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

3. Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

4. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

5. School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

6. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

7. School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

8. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas

9. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Abstract

Introduction: Promising new treatments exist for advanced prostate cancer. Decision-making is complicated: there are minimal comparative effectiveness data; differing routes of administration, drug mechanisms of action, and side effects; and significant price differences. These challenges contribute to variations in care and quality, treatment disparities, and lack of concordance with patient values. The aim of this study was to examine physician perspectives of factors influencing decision-making for first-line advanced prostate cancer treatments. Methods: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of physicians who treat patients with advanced prostate cancer from September 2021 to June 2022. Participants were purposively sampled from across the United States. Results: Twenty-seven physicians participated. We identified 17 domains and three overarching themes affecting physician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer care. The themes were as follows: (1) physician and practice factors affect prescribing decisions, (2) health practice resource availability affects the likelihood that patients will receive the recommended treatment and that the treatment will be in-line with patients' values, and (3) patient nonclinical factors influence physician decision-making, but patient values could be better incorporated into prescribing decisions. Based on the analyses, we constructed a preliminary framework of clinician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer. Conclusions: Physicians perceive that nonclinical patient, physician, and practice factors affect decision-making. These factors, therefore, must be considered when implementing programs to optimize a physician's ability to provide quality cancer care, reduce health care disparities and patient financial burden, and provide patient goal concordant care. The preliminary theoretical model of clinician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer care may also be used to inform these efforts.

Funder

American Urological Association

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3