Effect of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Dose in Myocardial Infarction With Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function

Author:

Kim Hee-Yeol1,Mok Jisu12,Kim Jae-Young3,Jeon Doosoo4,Her Sung-Ho5,Park Mahn Won6,Kim Dong-Bin1,Park Chul-Su7,Lee Jong-Min8,Chang Kiyuk9,Jung Wook Sung9,Ahn Yongkeun10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea;

2. Cardiovascular Research Institute for Intractable Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea;

3. Department of Statistics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea;

4. Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea;

5. Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea;

6. Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea;

7. Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea;

8. Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea;

9. Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea; and

10. Caridiovascular Center, Chonnam National University Hosptial, Kwangju, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Abstract: There have been few studies of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) dose in myocardial infarction (MI) with preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function. We evaluated the association of ARB dose with clinical outcomes after MI with preserved LV systolic function. We used MI multicenter registry. Six months after discharge, the ARB dose was indexed to the target ARB doses used in randomized clinical trials and grouped as >0%–25% (n = 2333), >25% of the target dose (n = 1204), and no ARB (n = 1263). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiac death or MI. Univariate analysis showed that mortality of those with any ARB dose was lower than those without ARB therapy. After multivariable adjustment, patients receiving >25% of target dose had a similar risk of cardiac death or MI compared with those receiving ≤25% or no ARB [hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–1.33; HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82–1.08, respectively]. Propensity score analysis also demonstrated that patients with >25% dose had no difference in primary endpoint compared with those ≤25% dose or the no ARB group (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79–1.33; HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64–1.14, respectively). The present study demonstrates that patients treated with >25% of target ARB dose do not have better clinical outcomes than those treated with ≤25% of target ARB dose or those with no ARB dose in MI patients with preserved LV systolic function.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3