Solid or Gaseous Circulating Brain Emboli: Are They Separable by Transcranial Ultrasound?

Author:

Darbellay Georges A.1,Duff Rebecca12,Vesin Jean-Marc1,Despland Paul-André3,Droste Dirk W.4,Molina Carlos5,Serena Joachim6,Sztajzel Roman7,Ruchat Patrick8,Karapanayiotides Theodoros3,Kalangos Afksendyios29,Bogousslavsky Julien3,Ringelstein Erich B.4,Devuyst Gérald3

Affiliation:

1. Signal Processing Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland;

2. Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

3. Department of Neurology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland;

4. Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Münster, Germany;

5. Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Girona, Spain

6. Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain;

7. Department of Neurology, HUG, Geneva, Switzerland

8. Cardiovascular Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland;

9. Cardiovascular Surgery, HUG, Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

High-intensity transient signals (HITS) detected by transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound may correspond to artifacts or to microembolic signals, the latter being either solid or gaseous emboli. The goal of this study was to assess what can be achieved with an automatic signal processing system for artifact/microembolic signals and solid/gas differentiation in different clinical situations. The authors studied 3,428 HITS in vivo in a multicenter study, i.e., 1,608 artifacts in healthy subjects, 649 solid emboli in stroke patients with a carotid stenosis, and 1,171 gaseous emboli in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale. They worked with the dual-gate TCD combined to three types of statistical classifiers: binary decision trees (BDT), artificial neural networks (ANN), and support vector machines (SVM). The sensitivity and specificity to separate artifacts from microembolic signals by BDT reached was 94% and 97%, respectively. For the discrimination between solid and gaseous emboli, the classifier achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 81% for BDT, 84% and 84% for ANN, and 86% and 86% for SVM, respectively. The current results for artifact elimination and solid/gas differentiation are already useful to extract data for future prospective clinical studies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology,Neurology

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3