Digital Collateral Information Through Electronic and Social Media in Psychotherapy: Comparing Clinician-reported Trends Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Vahia Ipsit V.,Sava Rachel N.,Cray Hailey V.,Kim Heejung J.,Dickinson Rebecca A.,Ressler Kerry J.,Trueba Ana F.

Abstract

Background: Patient clinical collateral information is critical for providing psychiatric and psychotherapeutic care. With the shift to primarily virtual care triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic, psychotherapists may have received less clinical information than they did when they were providing in-person care. This study assesses whether the shift to virtual care had an impact on therapists’ use of patients’ electronic and social media to augment clinical information that may inform psychotherapy. Methods: In 2018, we conducted a survey of a cohort of psychotherapists affiliated with McLean Hospital. We then reapproached the same cohort of providers for the current study, gathering survey responses from August 10, 2020, to September 1, 2020, for this analysis. We asked clinicians whether they viewed patients’ electronic and social media in the context of their psychotherapeutic relationship, what they viewed, how much they viewed it, and their attitudes about doing so. Results: Of the 99 respondents, 64 (64.6%) had viewed at least 1 patient’s social media and 8 (8.1%) had viewed a patient’s electronic media. Of those who reported viewing patients’ media, 70 (97.2%) indicated they believed this information helped them provide more effective treatment. Compared with the 2018 prepandemic data, there were significantly more clinicians with>10 years of experience reporting media use in therapy. There was also a significant increase during the pandemic in the viewing of media of adult patients and a trend toward an increase in viewing of media of older adult patients. Conclusions: Review of patients’ electronic and social media in therapy became more common among clinicians at a large psychiatric teaching hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings support continuing research about how reviewing patients’ media can inform and improve clinical care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. How parents and their children used social media and technology at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with anxiety;Drouin;Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw,2020

2. Denial of illness in schizophrenic outpatients: effects of psychopharmacological treatment;Hankoff;Arch Gen Psychiatry,1960

3. A Proposal for including patient-generated web-based creative writing material into psychotherapy: advantages and challenges;Lawver;Psychiatry (Edgmont),2008

4. Effect of integrating patient-generated digital data into mental health therapy: a randomized controlled trial;Merchant;Psychiatr Serv,2023

5. Language of ADHD in adults on social media;Guntuku;J Atten Disord,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3