Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO; and
2. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Abstract
Objectives:
Electronic patient-reported outcome measure (E-PROM) collection is a technological advancement that has the potential to facilitate PROM collection in orthopaedic trauma. The purpose of this study was to compare E-PROM versus in-person PROM collection.
Design:
This is a retrospective comparative study.
Setting:
Urban Level I trauma center.
Patients/Participants:
One hundred and fifty consecutive operative orthopaedic trauma patients.
Intervention:
The Percent of Normal single assessment numerical evaluation and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function were collected through automated e-mails from an online patient-engagement platform (PatientIQ, Chicago, IL) 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month postoperatively. The Percent of Normal was also administered to patients in clinic at the same time intervals.
Main Outcome Measurements:
Completion of PROMs; Loss to follow-up.
Results:
The median clinical follow-up time was 4 months (interquartile range: 1.3–6 months), and 42.7% (64/150) were lost to follow-up. Loss to follow-up was associated with a more disadvantaged area deprivation index [observed difference, 7.0, 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 13.0; P = 0.01] and noncommercial/no insurance (observed difference 34.8%, confidence interval, 20.9%–45.5%; P < 0.0001). In-person PROM collection was more successful than E-PROM collection at all intervals [2-week (51.3% vs 20.7), 6-week (46.7% vs 20.0%), 3-month (50.0% vs 18.7%), and 6-month (38.0% vs 18.7%), P < 0.0001]. Patients who completed 3-month E-PROMs had longer clinical follow-up (5.2 vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.004) and a trend of being less likely to be lost to follow-up (28.6% vs 45.9%, P = 0.13).
Conclusion:
E-PROMs were less successful than in-person PROM collection in trauma patients at an urban safety net trauma center.
Level of Evidence:
Diagnostic Level III.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献