Vertical versus Pfannenstiel incision modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of acetabular fractures

Author:

Kara Deniz1,Elmadag Nuh Mehmet2,Ali Jotyar3,Misir Abdulhamit4,Huzeyfe Cetin 5,Demirkiran Cemil Burak2,Mraja Hamisi6,Pulatkan Anil2

Affiliation:

1. Washington University School of Medicine, Orthopaedic Department, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

2. Bezmialem Vakif University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey

3. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Yeni Yuzyil University School of Medicine, Zeytinburnu, Istanbul, Turkey

4. Istanbul Center for Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Department,Bakirkoy,Istanbul, Turkey

5. Siirt Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Siirt, Turkey

6. Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the patient and fracture characteristics, radiological, functional, and quality of life outcomes, the need for a lateral window approach and requirement of total hip arthroplasty (THA), and complications in patients with simple and complex acetabular fractures who underwent a modified Stoppa approach through vertical and Pfannenstiel incisions. METHODS: Design: Retrospective comparison study Setting: Level one trauma center Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with acetabular fractures (OTA/AO type 62A-B-C) treated with vertical (Group V) or Pfannenstiel (Group P) incision modified Stoppa approach between 2010 and 2020. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Patient characteristics, radiological evaluations (reduction quality and posttraumatic osteoarthritis), patient functional outcomes (SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, HHS, and Merle d'Aubigne Apostel), approach modifications and stratification by fracture type and complications were compared between those treated with vertical or Pfannenstiel incisions. RESULTS: 104 patients (mean age of 38.5 ±14.3 year) were included. There was no significant difference between the Pfannenstiel or vertical groups regarding patient and fracture characteristics (p = 0.137), postoperative reduction quality (p = 0.130), or the mean functional and quality of life outcome scores at the last follow-up (p = 0.483 for HHS, p = 0.717 for Merle d'Aubigne Apostel score, p = 0.682 for SF-12 PCS, and p = 0.781 for SF-12 MCS). In group P, significantly more patients needed additional lateral incisions (40.8% vs. 10.9%; p 0.001) and total hip replacement procedures (12.2% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.049). The total, early, and late complication rates were significantly higher in group P (p 0.001, p = 0.034, and p = 0.049, respectively). CONCLUSION: Pfannenstiel incision was associated with higher complication rates than vertical incision in acetabular fractures treated through a modified Stoppa approach. Fracture complexity is associated with the need for a lateral window approach and THA, as well as a worse functional and radiological outcome regardless of incision type. However, it was not associated with the development of intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3