Iliosacral Screws Can Be Placed With Precision by Adjusting the Pelvic Inlet Between S1 and S2

Author:

Zuelzer David A.1,Ryan Lunden1,Westbrooks Tim1,Routt Milton L. “Chip”2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine (1) the natural incidence of sacral inlet angle differences between S1 and S2 and (2) implications for iliosacral screw placement with a technique to improve the accuracy of the intraoperative fluoroscopic inlet for S1 and S2. Design: Combined retrospective and prospective cohort reviews. Setting: Regional Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: After exclusion criteria, 300 patients with uninjured pelvic rings to determine the natural incidence of S1–S2 angle differences and 33 patients treated with iliosacral screws over the study period. Intervention: None in the retrospective cohort. In the prospective cohort, all patients underwent fluoroscopically assisted iliosacral screw fixation. Main Outcome Measurements: Radiographic determination of S1–S2 angle differences above 10 degrees in a natural population for the retrospective cohort. In the prospective, operative cohort, the outcome of interest was the safety of iliosacral screws in S1 and S2 as determined on intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative CT scan. Results: In the retrospective cohort, 180 of 300 (60.0%) had S1–S2 inlet angle differences above 10 degrees. In the operative cohort, 19 of 33 (57.6%) had S1–S2 inlet angle differences above 10 degrees. Of the iliosacral screws in S1 and S2 placed using the described imaging technique, all (69/69, 100%) were safe. Conclusions: A normal population determined that differences in the inlet angle between S1 and S2 are common. An operative cohort was treated using preoperative CT-based planning to define different intraoperative fluoroscopic inlet views for S1 and S2, if a larger difference existed. Using this technique, 69 of 69 (100%) iliosacral screws were safe. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3