Where Are We in 2022? A Summary of 11,000 Open Tibia Fractures Over 4 Decades

Author:

Castillo Isaac A.1,Heiner Jacob A.2,Meremikwu Ramzy I.3,Kellam James2,Warner Stephen J.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, TX;

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX; and

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the infection and nonunion rates for open tibia fracture treatment over the past 4 decades since the introduction of the Gustilo–Anderson (GA) open fracture classification. Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were reviewed using the PRISMA checklist for articles between 1977 and September 2018. Study Selection: One hundred sixty-one articles meeting the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between 1977 and 2018, reported infection rates, reported nonunion rates, and fractures classified by the GA open fracture criteria were selected. Data Extraction: All articles were thoroughly evaluated to extract infection and nonunion data for open tibia fractures. Data Synthesis: Due to variability in the data reviewed, statistical evaluation could not be reliably done. Results: 11,326 open tibia fractures were reported with 17% type I, 25.2% type II, 25.3% type IIIA, and 32.5% type IIIB/C. The average infection rate over 4 decades was 18.3%, with 24.3% superficial, 11.2% deep, and 14.7% pin tract. The infection rate by decade was 14% for 1977–1986, 16.2% for 1987–1996, 20.5% for 1997%–2006%, and 18.1% from 2007 to 2017. The overall nonunion rate was 14.1%. The nonunion rate was 13% for 1977–1986, 17% for 1987–1996, 12.8% for 1997%–2006%, and 12.3% for 2007–2017. Conclusions: This in-depth summary has demonstrated that the percentage rate for infections and nonunion has remained similar over the past 40 years. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3