Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Are Correlated With Tibial Shaft Fracture Nonunion Following Intramedullary Nailing

Author:

Dong WillieORCID,Thorne Tyler,Da Silva Zarek,Dauk Morgan,Marchand Lucas,Rothberg David,Higgins Thomas,Haller Justin

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) in surgically treated tibial shaft fracture patients progressing to union versus nonunion. METHODS: Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with operatively treated tibial shaft fractures (AO/OTA 42-A, B, C) using an intramedullary nail. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: PROMIS PF and PI were compared between patients progressing to union and patients requiring nonunion repair. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (196 union, 38 nonunion) were included consisting 144 men and 90 women. The mean age of included patients was 40.8 years. A significant difference in mean PROMIS PF between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1–3 months (P = 0.005), 3–6 months (P < 0.001), 6–9 months (P = 0.003), and 6–12 months (P = 0.018). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit decrease in PROMIS PF was significant at 3–6 months (OR 1.07, P = 0.028) and 6–9 months (OR 1.17, P = 0.015). A significant difference in mean PROMIS PI between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1–3 months (P = 0.001), 3–6 months (P = 0.005), and 6–9 months (P = 0.005). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit increase in PROMIS PI was significant at 1–3 months (OR 1.11, P = 0.005), 3–6 months (OR 1.10, P = 0.011), and 6–9 months (OR 1.23, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Poorly trending PROMIS PF and PI in the clinical setting is a factor that can be used to evaluate progression to nonunion following tibial shaft repair where imaging studies may lag behind. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3