Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: An Initial Report

Author:

Tiziani Simon1,Hinkle Andrew J.1,Mesarick Enzo C.2,Turner Alexander C.2,Kenfack Yves J.2,Dumas Ryan P.3,Grewal Ishvinder S.1,Park Caroline3,Sanders Drew T.1,Sathy Ashoke K.1,Starr Adam J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department for Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX;

2. UT Southwestern Medical School, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX; and

3. Division, Burn, Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Parkland Memorial Hospital/UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Abstract

Objectives: The extent and timing of surgery in severely injured patients remains an unsolved problem in orthopaedic trauma. Different laboratory values or scores have been used to try to predict mortality and estimate physiological reserve. The Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality (PTIM) has been validated as an electronic medical record–integrated algorithm to help with operative timing in trauma patients. The aim of this study was to report our initial experience with PTIM and how it relates to other scores. Methods: A retrospective chart review of level 1 and level 2 trauma patients admitted to our institution between December 2020 and November 2022 was conducted. Patients scored with PTIM with orthopaedic injuries were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18 years. Results: Seven hundred seventy-four patients (246 female patients) with a median age of 40.5 (18–101) were included. Mortality was 3.1%. Patients in the PTIM high-risk category (≥0.5) had a 20% mortality rate. The median PTIM was 0.075 (0–0.89) and the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9.0 (1–59). PTIM (P < 0.001) and ISS (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in surviving patients. PTIM was mentioned in 7.6% of cases, and in 1.7% of cases, providers indicated an action in response to the PTIM. PTIM and ISS were significantly higher in patients with documented PTIM. Conclusion: PTIM is better at predicting mortality compared with ISS. Our low rate of PTIM documentation in provider notes highlights the challenges of implementing a new algorithm. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3