Optimal Fixation Strategies for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients 18–59 Years of Age: An Analysis of 565 Cases Treated at 26 Level 1 Trauma Centers

Author:

Roser Tom1,Collinge Cory A.2,Giga Kashmeera1,Lebus George F.3,Beltran Michael J.4,Crist Brett5,Sems Stephen A.6,Gardner Michael J.7,Sagi H. Claude4,Archdeacon Michael T.4,Mir Hassan R.8,Rodriguez-Buitrago Andres9,Mitchell Phillip10,Tornetta Paul11,

Affiliation:

1. Texas Christian University School of Medicine, Fort Worth, TX;

2. Fort Worth Orthopedic Trauma Surgeons, Fort Worth, TX;

3. Texas Orthopaedic Associates, Fort Worth, TX;

4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH;

5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO;

6. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;

7. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA;

8. Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Florida Orthopaedic Institute and University of South Florida, Tampa, FL;

9. Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia;

10. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; and

11. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the difference in failure rates of surgical repair for displaced femoral neck fractures in patients younger than 60 years of age according to fixation strategy. METHODS: Design: This is a retrospective, comparative cohort study. Setting: Twenty-six Level 1 North American trauma centers. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients younger than 60 years of age with a displaced femoral neck fracture (OTA 31-B2, B3) undergoing surgical repair from 2005 to 2017. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Patient demographics, injury characteristics, repair methods used, and treatment failure (nonunion/failed fixation, avascular necrosis, and need for secondary surgery) were compared according to fixation strategy. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria and were studied. The mean age was 42 years, 36% were female, and the average Pauwels' angle of fractures was 55 degrees. There were 305 patients treated with multiple cannulated screws (MCS) and 260 treated with a fixed-angle (FA) construct. Treatment failures were 46% overall, but was more likely to occur in MCS constructs versus FA devices (55% vs. 36%, P < 0.001). When FA constructs were substratified, the use of a sliding hip screw with addition of a medial femoral neck buttress plate (FNBP) and “antirotation” (AR) screw demonstrated better results than either FNBP or AR screw alone or neither with the lowest overall construct failure rate of 11% (P < 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Historically used fixation constructs for femoral neck fractures (eg, multiple cannulated screws and sliding hip screw) in young and middle-aged adults performed poorly compared with more recently proposed constructs, including those using a medial femoral neck buttress plate and an antirotation screw. Fixed-angle constructs outperformed multiple cannulated screws overall, and augmentation of fixed-angle constructs with a medial femoral neck buttress plate and antirotation screw improved the likelihood of successful treatment. Surgeons should prioritize fixation decisions when repairing displaced femoral neck fractures in patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3