Psychosocial Evaluation of Living Kidney Donors: A Survey of Current Practices in the United States

Author:

Clifton Erin1,Winder Gerald Scott1,Lentine Krista L.2,Zimbrean Paula C.3,Yadav Anju4,Rubman Susan5,Kalil Roberto6,Kumar Vineeta7,Prashar Rohini8,Gan Geliang9,Deng Yanhong9,Joyce Michael10,Holmes Rachel11,Laflen Jennie12,Bakhai Darsh13,Liapakis AnnMarie14,Doshi Mona D.15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

2. Department of Internal Medicine, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO.

3. Departments of Psychiatry and Surgery (Transplant), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

4. Division of Nephrology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

5. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

6. Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.

7. Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

8. Henry Ford Transplant Institute, Detroit, MI.

9. Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, CT.

10. Department of Social Work, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.

11. Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.

12. Department of Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.

13. Department of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

14. Department of Internal Medicine, New York University, New York, NY.

15. Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Abstract

Background. Best practices in psychosocial evaluation and care of living donor candidates and donors are not well established. Methods. We surveyed 195 living kidney donor (LKD) transplant centers in United States from October 2021 to April 2022 querying (1) composition of psychosocial teams, (2) evaluation processes including clinical tools and domains assessed, (3) selection criteria, and (4) psychosocial follow-up post-donation. Results. We received 161 responses from 104 programs, representing 53% of active LKD programs and 67% of LKD transplant volume in 2019. Most respondents (63%) were social workers/independent living donor advocates. Over 90% of respondents indicated donor candidates with known mental health or substance use disorders were initially evaluated by the psychosocial team. Validated psychometric or transplant-specific tools were rarely utilized but domains assessed were consistent. Active suicidality, self-harm, and psychosis were considered absolute contraindications in >90% of programs. Active depression was absolute contraindication in 50% of programs; active anxiety disorder was excluded 27%. Conditions not contraindicated to donation include those in remission: anxiety (56%), depression (53%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (41%). There was acceptance of donor candidates using alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis recreationally, but not if pattern met criteria for active use disorder. Seventy-one percent of programs conducted post-donation psychosocial assessment and use local resources to support donors. Conclusions. There was variation in acceptance of donor candidates with mental health or substance use disorders. Although most programs conducted psychosocial screening post-donation, support is not standardized and unclear if adequate. Future studies are needed for consensus building among transplant centers to form guidelines for donor evaluation, acceptance, and support.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference22 articles.

1. Consensus statement on the live organ donor.;Abecassis;JAMA,2000

2. The development of practice guidelines for independent living donor advocates.;Steel;Clin Transplant,2013

3. The psychosocial and independent living donor advocate evaluation and post-surgery care of living donors.;Rudow;J Clin Psychol Med Settings,2015

4. KDIGO clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors.;Lentine;Transplantation,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3