A Multicenter Validation of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Quantitation Using [123I]Iodoamphetamine and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

Author:

Iida Hidehiro,Akutsu Tooru1,Endo Keigo2,Fukuda Hiroshi3,Inoue Takeshi4,Ito Hiroshi3,Koga Sukehiko5,Komatani Akio1,Kuwabara Yasuo6,Momose Toshimitsu,Nishizawa Sadahiko7,Odano Ikuo8,Ohkubo Masaki8,Sasaki Yasuhito9,Suzuki Hideki2,Tanada Shuuji4,Toyama Hiroshi5,Yonekura Yoshiharu7,Yoshida Tsuyoshi6,Uemura Kazuo

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata

2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University School of Medicine, Gunma

3. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Miyage University, Tohoku

4. Department of Radiology, Ehime University School of Medicine, Ehime

5. Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi

6. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, School of Medicine, Kyoto

8. Department of Radiology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata

9. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo

Abstract

Recently, two methods have been proposed for regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) quantitation using [123I]iodoamphetamine (IMP) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The table look-up (TLU) method has been shown to provide both rCBF and volume of distribution, Vd, images from two SPECT scans, while a single-scan autoradiographic (ARG) technique provided rCBF using a fixed and assumed Vd. In both methods, a single blood sample was referred to calibrate the previously determined standard input function The present multicenter project was designed to evaluate the accuracy of both methods for use as clinical investigative tools. Ten independent institutions performed [123I]IMP-SPECT studies according to both methods in 76 subjects (10 normal volunteers, 32 patients with cerebrovascular disease, and 34 patients with other diseases). Calculated rCBF values were compared with those obtained by the following reference methods available in the participating institutions; [15O] H2O positron emission tomography (PET) (five institutions), [133Xe]SPECT (four institutions), and the [123I]IMP microsphere method (three institutions). Both ARG and TLU methods provided rCBF values that were significantly correlated with those measured by the [15O] H2O PET technique ( p < 0.001 for all subjects; overall regression equation, y = 15.14 + 0.54×) and those measured by the [123I]IMP-microsphere method ( p < 0.001 for all subjects; y = 2.0 + 0.80×). Significant correlation ( p < 0.05) was observed in 18 of 24 subjects studied with the [133Xe] SPECT reference technique (overall regression equation, y = 15.0 + 0.55×). Mean cortical gray matter rCBF in a group of normal subject was 43.9 ± 3.3 and 43.4 ± 2.0 ml/min/100 g for the ARG and TLU methods, respectively. Regional Vd of [123I]IMP estimated by the TLU method was 45 ml/ml ± 20% in the normal cortical region. Close agreement between ARG and TLU rCBF values was observed (y = −3.21 + 1.07×, r = 0.97), confirming the validity of assuming a fixed Vd in the ARG method. Results of this study demonstrate that both the ARG and TLU methods accurately and reliably estimate rCBF in a variety of clinical settings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology,Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3