Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (YPB-001)

Author:

Matsui Hiroto1,Ioka Tatsuya2,Takahashi Tsuyoshi3,Kawaoka Toru4,Maeda Yoshinari5,Yahara Noboru6,Kubo Hidefumi7,Nishimura Taku8,Inokuchi Toshihiro9,Harada Eijiro10,Shindo Yoshitaro1,Tokumitsu Yukio1,Nakajima Masao1,Takami Taro11,Ito Katsuyoshi12,Tanaka Hidekazu13,Hamano Kimikazu10,Nagano Hiroaki1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterological, Breast, and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine

2. Yamaguchi University Hospital Cancer Center, Ube

3. Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Yamaguchi General Hospital

4. Department of Surgery, Tokuyama Central Hospital, Yamaguchi

5. Department of Surgery, Tsushimi Hospital, Tsushima

6. Department of Surgery, Kanmon Medical Center, Shimonoseki

7. Department of Surgery, Ube Industries Central Hospital, Ube

8. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, JCHO Shimonoseki Medical Center, Shimonoseki

9. Department of Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Sanyoonoda

10. Departments of Surgery and Clinical Science

11. Gastroenterology and Hepatology

12. Radiology

13. Radiation Oncology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Abstract

Objectives The present multicenter prospective observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and those with RPC contacting major vessels, with respect to a historical control of upfront surgery. Materials and Methods Patients with BRPC and RPC contacting major vessels were prospectively registered and administered NAC with durations and regimens determined by the corresponding treating physician. Our primary aim was to assess the R0 resection rate, and secondary aim was to evaluate safety, resection rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and response rate. Results Fifty of 52 enrolled patients were analyzed; 2 with serious comorbidities died during treatment. Thirty-one patients underwent resection, with R0 resection being achieved in 26 (52% of total and 84% of all resected cases). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated age (≥75 years) as the only independent predictor of nonresection. Median progression-free survival and median survival time were longer in the prospective cohort than in the historical cohort. Conclusions Overall, NAC for BRPC in real-world setting might yield R0 resection rates similar to those reported in previous clinical studies. Development of safe regimens and management strategies that can maintain treatment intensity in geriatric patients is warranted.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3