Re-evaluating the Rose approach: comparative benefits of the population and high-risk preventive strategies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Re-evaluating the Rose approach: comparative benefits of the population and high-risk preventive strategies

Published:2009-10 Issue:5 Volume:16 Page:541-549
ISSN:1741-8267
Container-title:European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation
language:en
Short-container-title:European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation

Author:

Cooney Marie-Therese¹,Dudina Alexandra¹,Whincup Peter²,Capewell Simon³,Menotti Alessandro⁴,Jousilahti Pekka⁵,Njølstad Inger⁶,Oganov Raphel⁷,Thomsen Troels⁸,Tverdal Aage⁹,Wedel Hans¹⁰,Wilhelmsen Lars¹¹,Graham Ian¹,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Adelaide Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland

2. Division of Community Health Sciences, St. George's, University of London

3. Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

4. Association for Cardiac Research, Rome

5. Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland

6. Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromso, Tromso

7. Centre for Preventive Medicine, Glostrup University Hospital, Denmark

8. National Research Centre for Preventive Medicine, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russian Federation

9. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

10. Nordic School of Public Health, Goteburg

11. Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteburg University, Sweden