Establishing Criteria for Tumor Necrosis as Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Cancer

Author:

Kastinen Meeri1,Sirniö Päivi1,Elomaa Hanna23,Äijälä Ville K.1,Karjalainen Henna1,Tapiainen Vilja V.1,Pohjanen Vesa-Matti1,Kemppainen Janette1,Sliashynskaya Katja1,Ahtiainen Maarit4,Rintala Jukka1,Meriläinen Sanna1,Rautio Tero1,Saarnio Juha1,Mattila Taneli T.1,Lindgren Outi1,Wirta Erkki-Ville56,Helminen Olli1,Seppälä Toni T.678,Böhm Jan4,Mecklin Jukka-Pekka39,Tuomisto Anne1,Mäkinen Markus J.1,Väyrynen Juha P.1

Affiliation:

1. Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, and University of Oulu, Oulu

2. Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä

3. Department of Education and Research, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä

4. Department of Pathology, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä

5. Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere

6. Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere

7. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki

8. Applied Tumor Genomics, Research Program Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki

9. Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

Abstract

Tumor necrosis has been reported to represent an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, but its evaluation methods have not been described in sufficient detail to introduce tumor necrosis evaluation into clinical use. To study the potential of tumor necrosis as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer, criteria for 3 methods for its evaluation were defined: the average percentage method (tumor necrosis percentage of the whole tumor), the hotspot method (tumor necrosis percentage in a single hotspot), and the linear method (the diameter of the single largest necrotic focus). Cox regression models were used to calculate cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for tumor necrosis categories in 2 colorectal cancer cohorts with more than 1800 cases. For reproducibility assessment, 30 cases were evaluated by 9 investigators, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and Cohen’s kappa coefficients were calculated. We found that all 3 methods predicted colorectal cancer-specific survival independent of other prognostic parameters, including disease stage, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor budding. The greatest multivariable HRs were observed for the average percentage method (cohort 1: HR for ≥ 40% vs. <3% 3.03, 95% CI, 1.93-4.78; cohort 2: HR for ≥ 40% vs. < 3% 2.97; 95% CI, 1.63-5.40). All 3 methods had high reproducibility, with the linear method showing the highest mean Spearman’s correlation coefficient (0.91) and Cohen’s kappa (0.70). In conclusion, detailed criteria for tumor necrosis evaluation were established. All 3 methods showed good reproducibility and predictive ability. The findings pave the way for the use of tumor necrosis as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3