Competitiveness of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs and Applicants

Author:

Michelotti Ali M.,Stansbury Nicholas,Treffalls Rebecca N.,Page-Ramsey Sarah M.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in competitiveness of obstetrics and gynecology programs over 20 years using a normalized competitive index. METHODS: Obstetrics and gynecology match data were obtained from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) for 2003–2022. Applicant metrics (United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, score percentiles, research output and experiences, and work and volunteer experiences) were obtained from the NRMP and the Association of American Medical Colleges (2007–2021). The competitive index was calculated using the number of positions available divided by match rate each year between 2003 and 2022. The normalized competitive index was calculated by dividing the yearly competitive index by the average competitive index over 20 years. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and linear regressions. RESULTS: When comparing the two decades (2003–2012 vs 2013–2022), applicants (1,539±242 vs 1,902±144; P<.001), positions (1,173±31 vs 1,345±98; P<.001), and number of programs ranked per applicant (13±1.4 vs 15±0.6; P<.001) have increased. While the match rate did not significantly change from 2003 to 2022 (75.5%±9.9% vs 70.5%±1.6%; P=.14), the normalized competitive index increased (R2=0.92, P<.001), indicating increased competitiveness. Applicant metrics increased over time, including research output (2.4±0.8 vs 5.0±0.7; P=.002) and work experiences (2.9±0.2 vs 3.6±0.1; P=.002; R2=0.98, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in obstetrics and gynecology applicants and applicant metrics, match rates remain unchanged. However, the competitiveness of programs has significantly increased, as demonstrated by the normalized competitive index, applicants per position, and applicant metrics. The normalized competitive index is a useful metric for applicants to determine program or applicant competitiveness, especially when used alongside applicant metrics.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3