Author:
Passias Peter G.,Bortz Cole,Horn Samantha R.,Segreto Frank A.,Stekas Nicholas,Ge David H.,Alas Haddy,Varlotta Christopher G.,Frangella Nicholas J.,Lafage Renaud,Lafage Virginie,Steinmetz Leah,Vasquez-Montes Dennis,Diebo Bassel,Janjua Muhammad B.,Moawad Mohamed A.,Deflorimonte Chloe,Protopsaltis Themistocles S.,Buckland Aaron J.,Gerling Michael C.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Clinical Neurology,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference28 articles.
1. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF;Mobbs;J Spine Surg,2015
2. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study;Seng;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2013
3. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review;Goldstein;J Neurosurg Spine,2016
4. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis;Parker;World Neurosurg,2014
5. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery;Kim;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2010