Network Meta-Analysis of C5 Palsy After Anterior Cervical Decompression of Three to Six Levels

Author:

Takase Hajime12,Haze Tatsuya134,Yamamoto Daisuke5,Inagaki Naoko1,Nitta Manabu1,Murata Hidetoshi6,Yamamoto Tetsuya2

Affiliation:

1. YCU Center for Novel and Exploratory Clinical Trials (Y-NEXT), Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama

3. Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama

4. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama

5. Department of Neurosurgery, Kitasato University, Sagamihara

6. Department of Neurosurgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan

Abstract

Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective. Using a network meta-analysis (NMA), this study aimed to compare the risks of C5 palsy after three different procedures of anterior cervical decompression. Summary of Background Data. C5 palsy is a well-known complication affecting the quality of life after anterior procedures. Due to the limited evidence on the various procedures available, we evaluate the basis for selection to prevent palsy and achieve maximal decompression in cases spanning 3-6 levels. Materials and Methods. We conducted a comprehensive search for C5 palsy and complications after 3representative procedures, including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), and their combination (hybrid), involving 3 to 6 intervertebral levels. The incidence of C5 palsy was compared using a NMA. Results. We identified 1655 patients in 11 studies who met inclusion criteria. Sixty-nine patients (4.2%) developed delayed C5 palsies. The incidences among ACDF, ACCF, and hybrid cases were 2.3% (16/684, 95% CI: 1.4% to 3.8%), 6.4% (39/613, 95% CI: 4.7% to 8.6%), and 3.9% (14/358, 95% CI: 2.3% to 6.5%), respectively (P< 0.01). A NMA was performed for 15 pairwise comparisons across the 3 procedure arms: ACDF versushybrid, 7/232 (3.0%) versus11/234 (4.7%); hybrid versusACCF, 14/301 (4.3%) versus18/224 (8.0%); ACCF versusACDF, 38/523 (7.8%) versus16/619 (2.6%). Compared with ACDF, the risk of C5 palsy was significantly higher in ACCF (odds ratio: 2.72, 95% CI: 1.47 to 5.01), whereas ACDF versushybrid did not significantly differ in risk (odds ratio: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.68 to 3.60). Conclusion. We determined that ACCF was associated with a higher risk of postoperative C5 palsy than ACDF in cases spanning 3 to 6 intervertebral levels. If practicable, ACDF surgery may be an appropriate choice for cases requiring anterior decompression of 3 to 6 levels. Level of Evidence. Level III.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3