Medical Malpractice Litigation Due to Off-Label Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein

Author:

Weldon Edward1,Razzouk Jacob2,Bohen Daniel3,Ramos Omar4,Danisa Olumide5,Cheng Wayne6

Affiliation:

1. John A Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI

2. School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA

3. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

4. Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN

5. Department of Orthopedics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA

6. Jerry L Pettis Memorial Veterans Hospital, Loma Linda, CA

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To analyze the incidence and characteristics of malpractice lawsuits pertaining to the off-label use of Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). Summary of Background Data. BMP continues to be a popular alternative to the use of autologous bone graft during spinal fusion procedures. However, ~85% of BMP is used in an off-label manner, which may expose surgeons to claims of malpractice. Methods. Westlaw and VerdictSearch were queried for malpractice claims filed between 2000 and 2022 using the keywords “bone graft” and “spine.” Case inclusion criteria were defined as a plaintiff’s basis of litigation resting on a claim of medical malpractice due to off-label use of BMP. Additional collected data included the date of the case hearing, plaintiff's sex and age, defendants named in the lawsuit, verdict ruling, location of the filed claim, payment or settlement amount, sustained injuries, and additional allegations. Results. Of 971 claims reviewed, 89 cases were due to off-label BMP use. The posterior approach was identified as the most common approach among the 89 cases. Of the 30 cases naming a surgeon defendant, 50% included allegations of insufficient informed consent. The most frequent adverse events were ectopic bone growth resulting in chronic pain or nerve damage. Zero cases involved heterotopic ossification, wound dehiscence, graft subsidence, hematoma, bladder retention, or retrograde ejaculation. Conclusion. A clear understanding that on-label BMP use is specific to single-level, anterior or anterolateral approaches between L2-S1 with vendor-specific cages is crucial for mitigating malpractice disputes. Though off-label use of BMP may incite litigation, the findings suggest court rulings are favorable for defendants as zero cases, resulting in plaintiff verdicts. Nevertheless, surgeons should balance the potential benefits of off-label use of BMP with the increased risk of litigation, and it may be advisable to disclose the use of BMP, whether on-label or off-label, in the informed consent.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3