Ergonomics in Spine Surgery

Author:

Alostaz Murad,Bansal Aiyush,Gyawali Purnima,Louie Philip K.

Abstract

Study Design. Systematic Review Objective. This systematic review aims to synthesize existing studies and highlight the significance of ergonomic considerations for spine surgeons’ well-being and the impact on patient outcomes. Summary of Background Data. Spine surgery is a physically demanding field that poses several risks to surgeons, particularly with musculoskeletal disorders. Despite the well-documented consequences of musculoskeletal injuries endured by surgeons, surgical ergonomics in spine surgery has received limited attention. Methods. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase. Studies focusing on surgeon ergonomics in spine surgery were selected. Data extracted included study details, surgeon demographics, ergonomic factors, and outcomes. Qualitative analysis was performed due to the heterogeneous nature of study designs and criteria. Results. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Six studies utilized surveys to explore physical challenges, prevalence rates of pain, work practices, and ergonomic tools. Two studies employed optoelectronic motion analysis to assess spinal angles of the surgeon during surgery. Two studies assesed ergonomics in different visualization methods using rapid entire body assessment (REBA). One study applied video analysis to scrutinize surgeons’ neck postures during the case. The results demonstrated a varying prevalence and diverse presentations of musculoskeletal disorders, varying impact on surgical performance, and nuanced relationships between experience, workload, and ergonomic concerns. Conclusion. This systematic review summarizes the heterogenous evaluations of ergonomics in spine surgery. Overall, upwards of three-quarters of spine surgeons have reported musculoskeletal discomfort, most commonly presented as back pain, neck pain, and hand/wrist discomfort. These symptoms are often exacerbated by the use of loupes, operating bed height, and extended period of times in various positions. Studies demonstrate that the physical discomfort is associated with the surgeons’ mental and emotional well-being, leading to stress, burnout, and reduced job satisfaction; all of which impact patient care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference26 articles.

1. Musculoskeletal disorders among spine surgeons: Results of a survey of the Scoliosis Research Society membership;Auerbach;Spine,2011

2. Physical job demands and related health complaints among surgeons;Ruitenburg;Int Arch Occup Environ Health,2013

3. A survey of musculoskeletal disorders in the orthopaedic surgeon: Identifying injuries, exacerbating workplace factors, and treatment patterns in the orthopaedic community;Swank;J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev,2022

4. Occupational injury among orthopaedic surgeons;Davis;J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013

5. Spine surgeon’s kinematics during discectomy according to operating table height and the methods to visualize the surgical field;Park;Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3