A Regional Analysis of Low Back Pain Treatments in the Military Health System

Author:

Lurie Jon D.1ORCID,Leggett Christopher G.2,Skinner Jonathan3,Carragee Eugene4,Austin Andrea M.2,Luan William Patrick5

Affiliation:

1. Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH

2. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH

3. Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA

5. The Institute for Defense Analysis, Alexandria, VA

Abstract

Study Design. Claims-based analysis of cohorts of TRICARE Prime beneficiaries. Objective. To compare rates of utilization of 5 low back pain (LBP) treatments (physical therapy (PT), manual therapy, behavioral therapies, opioid, and benzodiazepine prescription) across catchment areas and assess their association with the resolution of LBP. Summary of Background. Guidelines support focusing on nonpharmacologic management for LBP and reducing opioid use. Little is known about patterns of care for LBP across the Military Health System. Patients and Methods. Incident LBP diagnoses were identified data using the International Classification of Diseases ninth revision before October 2015 and 10th revision after October 2015; beneficiaries with “red flag” diagnoses and those stationed overseas, eligible for Medicare, or having other health insurance were excluded. After exclusions, there were 159,027 patients remained in the final analytic cohort across 73 catchment areas. Treatment was defined by catchment-level rates of treatment to avoid confounding by indication at the individual level; the primary outcome was the resolution of LBP defined as an absence of administrative claims for LBP during a 6 to 12-month period after the index diagnosis. Results. Adjusted rates of opioid prescribing across catchment areas ranged from 15% to 28%, physical therapy from 17% to 39%, and manual therapy from 5% to 26%. Multivariate logistic regression models showed a negative and marginally significant association between opioid prescriptions and LBP resolution (odds ratio: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00; P = 0.051) but no significant association with physical therapy, manual therapy, benzodiazepine prescription, or behavioral therapies. When the analysis was restricted to the subset of only active-duty beneficiaries, there was a stronger negative association between opioid prescription and LBP resolution (odds ratio: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.97). Conclusions. We found substantial variability across catchment areas within TRICARE for the treatment of LBP. Higher rates of opioid prescription were associated with worse outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Nonspecific low back pain;Chiarotto;N Engl J Med,2022

2. Low back pain in the uniformed service member: approach to surgical treatment based on a review of the literature;Schoenfeld;Mil Med,2011

3. Marching home, again: spine casualties, combat exposure, and the long wars;Carragee;Spine J,2012

4. Diagnoses of low back pain, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2010-2014;Clark;MSMR,2015

5. Utilization variation in military versus civilian care: evidence from TRICARE;Bond;Health Aff,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3