Low Back Pain

Author:

Dhodapkar Meera M,Modrak Maxwell,Halperin Scott J,Gouzoulis Michael J,Rubio Daniel R,Grauer Jonathan N

Abstract

Study design /setting. Retrospective study. Objective. To understand what patients utilize emergency departments (EDs) versus urgent care centers for low back pain (LBP). Summary of Background Data. LBP is a common reason for ED visits. In the setting of trauma, or recent surgery, the resources of EDs may be needed. However, urgent care centers, may be appropriate for other cases. Methods. Adult patients less than 65 years of age presenting to the ED or urgent care on the day of diagnosis of low back pain were identified from the 2019 PearlDiver M151 administrative database. Exclusion criteria included history of radiculopathy or sciatica, spinal surgery, spinal cord injury, other traumatic, neoplastic, or infectious diagnoses in the 90 days prior, or Medicare insurance. Patient age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), geographic region, insurance, and management strategies were extracted. Factors associated with urgent care relative to ED utilization were assessed using multivariable analysis. Results. Of 356,284 LBP patients, ED visits were identified for 345,390 (96.9%) and urgent care visits for 10,894 (3.1%). Factors associated with urgent care use relative to the ED were: geographic region (relative to Midwest; Northeast odds ratio (OR) 5.49, South OR 1.54, West OR 1.32), insurance (relative to Medicaid; Commercial OR 4.06), lower ECI (OR 1.28 per 2-point decrease), and higher age (OR 1.10 per decade), female sex (OR 1.09), and use of advanced imaging (OR 0.08) within 1 week (P<0.001 for all). Conclusions. Most patients presenting for a first diagnosis of isolated LBP went to the ED relative to urgent care. The greatest drivers of urgent care versus ED utilization for low back pain were insurance type and geographic region. Utilization of advanced imaging was higher among ED patients, but rates of surgical intervention were similar between those seen in the ED and urgent care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3