Healthcare Costs Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

Author:

Nin Darren Z.12,Chen Ya-Wen2,Kim David H.13,Niu Ruijia1,Powers Andrew4,Chang David C.12,Hwang Raymond W.13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital

2. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School

3. Tufts University School of Medicine

4. Division of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School

Abstract

Study Design. Observational cohort study. Objective. To describe the postoperative costs associated with both ACDF and CDA in the two-year period following surgery. Summary of Background Data. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an increasingly common alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical disc disorders. Although a number of studies have compared clinical outcomes between both procedures, much less is known about the postoperative economic burden of each procedure. Methods. By analyzing a commercial insurance claims database (Marketscan, Merative), patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF and CDA procedures, between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, were identified and included in the study. The primary outcome was the cost of payments for postoperative management in the two-year period following ACDF or CDA. Identified postoperative interventions included in the study were: (i) physical therapy, (ii) pain medication, (iii) injections, (iv) psychological treatment, and (iv) subsequent spine surgeries. Results. 2,304 patients (age, 49.0±9.4 years; male, 50.1%) were included in the study. 1,723 (74.8%) patients underwent ACDF while 581 (25.2%) underwent CDA. Cost of surgery was similar between both groups (ACDF, $26,819±23,449; CDA, $25,954±20,620; P=0.429). 30-day, 90-day, and two-year global costs were all lower for patients who underwent CDA compared to ACDF ($31,024 vs $34,411, $33,064 vs $37,517, and $55,723 vs $68,113, respectively). Conclusion. Lower two-year healthcare costs were found for patients undergoing CDA compared to ACDF. Further work is necessary to determine the drivers these findings and associated longer-term outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3