Affiliation:
1. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
2. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Abstract
Study Design.
Matched cohort comparison.
Objective.
To determine perioperative outcomes of erector spinae plane (ESP) block for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).
Summary of Background Data.
There is a paucity of data on the impact of lumbar ESP block on perioperative outcomes and its safety in MI-TLIF.
Materials and Methods.
Patients who underwent 1-level MI-TLIF and received the ESP block (group E) were included. An age and sex-matched control group was selected from a historical cohort that received the standard-of-care (group NE). The primary outcome of this study was 24-hour opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes were pain severity measured by a numeric rating scale, opioid-related side effects, and hospital length of stay. Outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results.
Ninety-eight and 55 patients were included in the E and NE groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in patient demographics. Group E had lower 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (P = 0.117, not significant), reduced opioid consumption on a postoperative day (POD) 0 (P = 0.016), and lower first pain scores postsurgery (P < 0.001). Group E had lower intraoperative opioid requirements (P < 0.001), and significantly lower average numeric rating scale pain scores on POD 0 (P = 0.034). Group E reported fewer opioid-related side effects as compared with group NE, although this was not statistically significant. The average highest postoperative pain score within 3 hours postprocedurally was 6.9 and 7.7 in the E and NE cohorts, respectively (P = 0.029). The median length of stay was comparable between groups with the majority of patients in both groups being discharged on POD 1.
Conclusions.
In our retrospective matched cohort, ESP blocks resulted in reduced opioid consumption and decreased pain scores on POD 0 in patients undergoing MI-TLIF.
Level of Evidence.
Level 3.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference47 articles.
1. Pain management following spinal surgeries: an appraisal of the available options;Bajwa;J Craniovertebr Junction Spine,2015
2. Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: a review of the modern literature;De Rojas;Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2014
3. Non-opioid analgesics: novel approaches to perioperative analgesia for major spine surgery;Dunn;Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol,2016
4. A multimodal approach for postoperative pain management after lumbar decompression surgery: a prospective, randomized study;Garcia;J Spinal Disord Tech,2013
5. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF;Mobbs;J Spine Surg,2015
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献