Synthetic Interbody Devices and Traditional Bone Graft are Associated With a Similar Rate of Surgical Complications after 1-2 level ACDFs

Author:

Shukla Geet1,Matur Abhijith V.1,Tao Xu1,Khalid Syed2,Garner Rebecca1,Gibson Justin1,Cass Daryn1,Wu Andrew1,Street Seth1,Garcia-Vargas Julia1,Mehta Jay3,Childress Kelly1,Duah Henry O.4,Motley Benjamin1,Cheng Joseph1,Adogwa Owoicho1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA

2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA

3. Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

4. Institute for Nursing Research & Scholarship, University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: To compare the rates of all-cause surgical complications of synthetic interbody devices versus allograft or autograft in patients undergoing 1-2 levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Summary of Background Data: Cervical degenerative disorders affects up to 60% of older adults in the US. Both traditional allograft or autograft and synthetic interbody devices (PEEK or titanium) are used for decompression and arthrodesis, with an increasing utilization of the latter. However, the differences in their postsurgical complication profiles are not well-characterized. Methods: Patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDF for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy between 2010-2022 were identified using the PearlDiver Mariner all-claims insurance database. Patients undergoing surgery for non-degenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed based on factors that were significant predictors of all-cause surgical complications in a linear regression model. The primary outcome measure was development of all-cause surgical complications following 1-2 levels ACDF. The secondary outcome was all-cause medical complications. Results: 1:1 exact matching resulted in two equal groups of 11,430 patients who received treatment with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autograft. No statistically significant difference in all-cause surgical complications were found between the synthetic cohort and the allograft or autograft cohort following 1-2 levels ACDFs (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.730-1.014, P = 0.079). No significant differences were observed regarding any specific surgical complications except for pseudoarthrosis (RR 0.73, 0.554-0.974, P = 0.037), which was higher in the allograft/autograft cohort. Conclusion: After 1:1 exact matching to control for confounding variables, the findings of this study suggest that all-cause surgical complications are similar in patients undergoing ACDFs with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autographs. However, the rate of pseudarthrosis appears to be higher in patients with allograft/autographs. Future prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3