Linguistic difference in the effect of organized programs on socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening: ecological study in Switzerland

Author:

Buclin Clement P.1,von Arx Martina2,Jolidon Vladimir23,Sandoval José Luis45,Buholzer-Mercier Fabienne6,Daverio Justine E.27,van der Linden Bernadette W.A.6,Wanner Philippe8,Guessous Idris4,Courvoisier Delphine S.7,Cullati Stéphane67

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals

2. Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

3. School of International Business and Marketing, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

4. Division of Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva

5. Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva

6. Department of Community Health, Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg

7. Quality of care division, Medical directorate, Geneva University Hospitals

8. Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to examine how the effect of organized mammography screening programs on breast cancer screening participation differ between socioeconomic strata and how this relationship may be modified by the context of linguistic differences. Switzerland, marked by its diverse linguistic landscape, reflects cultural variations alongside differences in public health strategies. The goal of this study was to assess potential socioeconomic differences in regional mammography screening programs effectiveness to improve breast cancer screening participation. Methods Data on 14 173 women in the regionally adapted breast cancer screening age range was drawn from five cross-sectional waves of the nationally representative Swiss Health Interview Survey (1997–2017). Socioeconomic indicators included education, household income, and employment status. Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios of up-to-date (last 2 years) mammography uptake. Inequality was assessed using relative index of inequality and the slope index of inequality. Results Organized screening programs were generally effective and increased up-to-date mammography uptake by close to 20 percentage points in both regions. While in the Latin cantons, screening programs had no impact on socioeconomic inequalities in screening, it reduced inequalities for women with lower education in the German cantons. This modification effect of screening programs was not seen for income and employment-related inequalities and did not differ across linguistic regions. Conclusions Public health agencies should consider the different cultural reception of programs as addressing these differences could help ensure that breast cancer screening initiatives are not only effective, but also culturally equitable across different socioeconomic groups.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3