Affiliation:
1. Department of General Surgery, Luwan Branch, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
2. Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China
Abstract
Background
A meta-analysis was performed in this study to evaluate the association between serum uric acid and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
Relevant observational studies observing the relationship between uric acid and the incidence of CRC were obtained by the search of electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. A randomized-effects model was selected to pool the data by incorporating the influence of potential heterogeneity.
Results
Eight observational studies involving 1,226,379 adults were included. During a mean follow-up duration of 12.8 years, CRC was developed in 12349 (1.0%) participants. Pooled results showed that compared to those with the lowest category of serum uric acid at baseline, participants with the highest category of serum uric acid had an increased incidence of CRC during follow-up [risk ratio (RR), 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–1.42; P < 0.001; I
2 = 0%]. Sensitivity analysis limited to prospective cohort studies retrieved similar results (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.19–1.47; P < 0.001; I
2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses showed consistent results in men and women, in estimates of the incidence of colon cancer and rectal cancer and in studies with different follow-up durations and quality scores (P for subgroup differences all > 0.05).
Conclusion
Although the cutoff for defining a high uric acid varied among the included studies, results of the meta-analysis suggest that a high serum uric acid may be associated with an increased risk of CRC in an adult population.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cancer Research,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Oncology,Epidemiology
Reference37 articles.
1. The good, the bad and the new about uric acid in cancer.;Allegrini;Cancers (Basel),2022
2. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews.;Amir-Behghadami;Emerg Med J,2020
3. Oxidative stress, inflammation and colorectal cancer: an overview.;Bardelcikova;Antioxidants (Basel),2023
4. Smoking and colorectal cancer risk, overall and by molecular subtypes: a meta-analysis.;Botteri;Am J Gastroenterol,2020
5. The colorectal cancer epidemic: challenges and opportunities for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.;Brenner;Br J Cancer,2018
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献