Efficacy and safety outcomes of drainage of intensive care pleural effusions: Study protocol for the ESODICE randomized controlled trial

Author:

Fysh Edward T. H.123,Mevavala Bhaumik V.34,Wigston Charlotte3,Hince Dana5,Sirisinghe Isuru3,Regli Adrian167,Litton Edward178,Wibrow Bradley14

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

2. Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

3. Intensive Care Unit, St John of God Midland Public and Private Hospitals, Perth, WA, Australia

4. Intensive Care Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia

5. Institute for Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia

6. St John of God Murdoch Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia

7. Intensive Care Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia

8. St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.

Abstract

Background: Pleural effusions are common in intensive care patients. Without strong evidence to guide management, clinicians variably undertake either intervention with drainage procedures, or expectant management, that is, observation, whilst treating the underlying cause. Early drainage may be associated with improved diagnostic accuracy and oxygenation, without increased complications. However, randomized evidence is needed to confirm these observations. Hypotheses: In patients diagnosed with a safely drainable pleural effusion while admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) and in whom there is no absolute indication for immediate drainage, intervention with early pleural drainage compared with initial expectant management: improves oxygenation and is safe. Aims: To undertake a phase II multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of early pleural effusion drainage compared with expectant management in the intensive care setting. Methods: Population – patients admitted in intensive care units and diagnosed with a safely drainable pleural effusion in whom there is no absolute indication for immediate drainage. Co-primary endpoints – ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio at 48 hours after randomization and number of Pleural Effusion Related Serious Adverse Events at 90 days. Inclusion criteria – admitted to intensive care, age > 18 years, pleural effusion safely drainable, and no absolute indication for immediate drainage. Exclusion criteria – in the opinion of treating clinician trial not in patient’s best interests, inability to gain consent from patient or responsible decision-maker, and patient requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Randomization – open-label, 1:1 patient ratio using permuted block randomization. Intervention and comparator – drainage of pleural effusion as opposed to expectant management. Outcomes – physiological data including ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen and/or ratio of oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio will be collected at randomization and 6 hourly until 72 hours or ICU discharge (whichever sooner). Adverse event and clinical data will be recorded daily to ICU discharge, hospital discharge and death up to 90 days after randomization.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3