Seeking Precision Healthcare in Rural Patients With Cancer: Learning Self-advocacy

Author:

Curtin Martha S.,Somayaji Darryl,Dickerson Suzanne S.

Abstract

Background Precision medicine initiatives are offering superior treatments for cancer, and equitable distribution of these care measures is desired. Gaining insight into the meanings and shared practices of individuals navigating a cancer diagnosis and treatment in a rural setting will help efforts to mitigate inequities in this domain. Objectives To (1) interpret individuals’ common meanings of a cancer diagnosis including what contributes to that meaning; (2) explicate the shared practices of individuals with cancer regarding accessing oncology care, including provider visits, testing, and treatments; and (3) interpret common understanding of testing and treatment options in individuals with cancer. Methods Using hermeneutic phenomenology, interviews with individuals who have cancer who may benefit from precision medicine initiatives and who live in a rural area were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by the research team until common meanings arose from the narratives. Results Fifteen participants provided in-depth interviews. Three main themes and a constitutive pattern emerged: (1) “Slipping through the cracks,” (2) Traveling this distance: “Gee, is there something closer?” and (3) Evoking some resilience: “Hope is a powerful word.” The constitutive pattern was: “The necessity of practicing and developing advocacy.” Conclusions Access to care in the rural setting is a complex concept and includes challenges with receiving care at a distance, travel to larger cities for adequate care, and coordination of care from multiple providers. Implications for Practice Efforts toward providing advocacy in the healthcare setting, as well as developing ways to make access to specialized cancer care more readily available, are important steps toward mitigation of inequities in rural areas.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3