Author:
Wylie Nia W.,Durrant Emma L.,Phillips Emma C.,De Jong Audrey,Schoettker Patrick,Kawagoe Izumi,de Pinho Martins Márcio,Zapatero Juliana,Graham Catriona,McNarry Alistair F.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The potential benefit of videolaryngoscopy use in facilitating tracheal intubation has already been established, however its use was actively encouraged during the COVID-19 pandemic as it was likely to improve intubation success and increase the patient-operator distance.
OBJECTIVES
We sought to establish videolaryngoscopy use before and after the early phases of the pandemic, whether institutions had acquired new devices during the COVID-19 pandemic, and whether there had been teaching on the devices acquired.
DESIGN
We designed a survey with 27 questions made available via the Joint Information Scientific Committee JISC online survey platform in English, French, Spanish, Chinese, Japanese and Portuguese. This was distributed through 18 anaesthetic and airway management societies.
SETTING
The survey was open for 54 to 90 days in various countries. The first responses were logged on the databases on 28 October 2021, with all databases closed on 26 January 2022. Reminders to participate were sent at the discretion of the administering organisations.
PARTICIPANTS
All anaesthetists and airway managers who received the study were eligible to participate.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Videolaryngoscopy use before the COVID-19 pandemic and at the time of the survey.
RESULTS
We received 4392 responses from 96 countries: 944/4336 (21.7%) were from trainees. Of the 3394 consultants, 70.8% (2402/3394) indicated no change in videolaryngoscopy use, 19.9% (675/3394) increased use and 9.3% (315/3393) reduced use. Among trainees 65.5% (618/943) reported no change in videolaryngoscopy use, 27.7% (261/943) increased use and 6.8% (64/943) reduced use. Overall, videolaryngoscope use increased by 10 absolute percentage points following the pandemic.
CONCLUSIONS
Videolaryngoscopy use increased following the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic but this was less than might have been expected.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献