Effects of anesthetic depth on postoperative pain and delirium: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis

Author:

Long Yuqin12,Feng Xiaomei3,Liu Hong4,Shan Xisheng12,Ji Fuhai12,Peng Ke12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China

2. Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China

3. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

4. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Whether anesthetic depth affects postoperative outcomes remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of deep vs. light anesthesia on postoperative pain, cognitive function, recovery from anesthesia, complications, and mortality. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched until January 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing deep and light anesthesia in adult surgical patients. The co-primary outcomes were postoperative pain and delirium (assessed using the confusion assessment method). We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. We assessed publication bias using the Begg's rank correlation test and Egger's linear regression. We evaluated the evidence using the trial sequential analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. We conducted subgroup analyses for pain scores at different postoperative time points and delirium according to cardiac or non-cardiac surgery. Results: A total of 26 trials with 10,743 patients were included. Deep anesthesia compared with light anesthesia (a mean difference in bispectral index of −12 to −11) was associated with lower pain scores at rest at 0 to 1 h postoperatively (weighted mean difference = −0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.25 to −0.18, P = 0.009; moderate-quality evidence) and an increased incidence of postoperative delirium (24.95% vs. 15.92%; risk ratio = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.28–1.91, P < 0.0001; high-quality evidence). No publication bias was detected. For the exploratory secondary outcomes, deep anesthesia was associated with prolonged postoperative recovery, without affecting neurocognitive outcomes, major complications, or mortality. In the subgroup analyses, the deep anesthesia group had lower pain scores at rest and on movement during 24 h postoperatively, without statistically significant subgroup differences, and deep anesthesia was associated with an increased incidence of delirium after non-cardiac and cardiac surgeries, without statistically significant subgroup differences. Conclusions: Deep anesthesia reduced early postoperative pain but increased postoperative delirium. The current evidence does not support the use of deep anesthesia in clinical practice.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,General Medicine

Reference68 articles.

1. Electroencephalography and brain oxygenation monitoring in the perioperative period;Scheeren;Anesth Analg,2019

2. The EEG signal: a window on the cortical brain activity;Constant;Paediatr Anaesth,2012

3. Depth of anaesthesia monitoring: What's available, what's validated and what's next?;Bruhn;Br J Anaesth,2006

4. Effects of bispectral index monitoring on ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and a cost analysis;Liu;Anesthesiology,2004

5. Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery;Punjasawadwong;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3