Long-term Outcomes of a 1-year Hypertension Quality Improvement Initiative in a Large Health System

Author:

Pfoh Elizabeth R.12ORCID,Dalton Jarrod3,Jones Robert2,Rothberg Michael B.12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Value-based Care Research

2. Cleveland Clinic Community Care

3. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Abstract

Background: Understanding whether practices retain outcomes attained during a quality improvement (QI) initiative can inform resource allocation. Objective: We report blood pressure (BP) control and medication intensification in the 3 years after a 2016 QI initiative ended. Research Design: Retrospective cohort Subjects: Adults with a diagnosis of hypertension who had a primary care visit in a large-integrated health system between 2015 and 2019 Measures: We report BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) at the last reading of each year. We used a multilevel regression to identify the adjusted propensity to receive medication intensification among patients with an elevated BP in the first half of the year. To examine variation, we identified the average predicted probability of control for each practice. Finally, we grouped practices by the proportion of their patients whose BP was controlled in 2016: lowest performing (<75%), middle (≥75%–<85%), and highest performing (≥85%). Results: The dataset contained 184,981 patients. From 2015 to 2019, the percentage of patients in control increased from 74% to 82%. In 2015, 38% of patients with elevated BP received medication intensification. This increased to 44% in 2016 and 50% in 2019. Practices varied in average BP control (from 62% to 91% in 2016 and 68% to 90% in 2019). All but one practice had a substantial increase from 2015 to 2016. Most maintained the gains through 2019. Higher-performing practices were more likely to intensify medications than lower-performing practices. Conclusions: Most practices maintained gains 3 years after the QI program ended. Low-performing practices should be the focus of QI programs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3