Implementing Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Stakeholder Engagement Principles in Models of Palliative Care Delivery and Advance Care Planning Research

Author:

Walling Anne M.12,Verma Manisha3,Grudzen Corita R.4,Enguidanos Susan5,Barrett Nadine J.6,Johnson Kimberly S.7,Combe Angela K.8,Johnston Fabian M.9,Greer Joseph A.10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, CA

2. Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA

3. Department of Medicine, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA

4. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

5. Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

6. Department of Social Science and Public Health Policy, Division of Population Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, Durham, NC

7. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

8. Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR

9. Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

10. Department of Psychiatry, Center for Psychiatric Oncology & Behavioral Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Abstract

Background: Given the many challenges of conducting research that addresses the palliative and end-of-life care needs of patients with serious illnesses, stakeholder engagement starting from the moment of study conceptualization and design is critical to ensure successful participant recruitment, data collection, intervention delivery, data analysis, and dissemination. Methods: Guided by a conceptual model published by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) entitled, “Measuring What Matters for Advancing the Science and Practice of Engagement”14 and with the support of a PCORI Engagement Officer, representatives from 9 PCORI-funded study teams formed a working group to survey team members and review, outline, and describe key lessons learned and best practices for promoting stakeholder engagement in palliative care research. Results: Almost all study teams engaged with patients/caregivers, clinicians, researchers, and health care system experts as stakeholder partners. About half the teams also included payers and training institutions as part of their stakeholder advisors as well as a range of content experts. Study teams relied on a variety of support structures and resources, and they employed 10 distinct methods for maintaining engagement. All engagement methods were generally considered to be effective by teams who used the method, though there was some variability in team-rated engagement quality of each method. Nine barriers to stakeholder engagement were identified across the 9 studies as well as 9 strategies (or facilitators) to overcome these barriers. We share examples of how stakeholder engagement impacted studies in all phases, including the preparatory phase, study initiation phase, execution phase, and data analysis/dissemination phase. Conclusions: Teams utilized a variety of resources and support structures as well as capitalized on multiple engagement methods for fostering stakeholder engagement, resulting in a high level of collaboration and integration.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3