A Cost Analysis of Rethink the Strip

Author:

Spees Lisa P.12,Young Laura A.3,Rees Jennifer4,Mottus Kathleen5,Leeman Jennifer246,Boynton Marcella H.43,Richman Erica5,Vu Maihan B.78,Donahue Katrina E.59

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health

2. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

3. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism

4. North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute

5. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research

6. School of Nursing

7. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health

8. Department of Family Medicine

9. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Abstract

Background: Routine self-monitoring of blood glucose is a low-value practice that provides limited benefit for patients with non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. Objectives: We estimated the costs of Rethink the Strip (RTS), a multistrategy approach to the de-implementation of self-monitoring of blood glucose in primary care. Research Design: RTS was conducted among 20 primary care clinics in North Carolina. We estimated the non–site-based and site-based costs of the 5 RTS strategies (practice facilitation, audit and feedback, provider champions, educational meetings, and educational materials) from the analytic perspective of an integrated health care system for 12 and 27-month time horizons. Material costs were tracked through project records, and personnel costs were assessed using activity-based costing. We used nationally based wage estimates. Results: Total RTS costs equaled $68,941 for 12 months. Specifically, non–site-based costs comprised $16,560. Most non–site-based costs ($11,822) were from the foundational programming and coding updates to the electronic health record data to develop the audit and feedback reports. The non–site-based costs of educational meetings, practice facilitation, and educational materials were substantially lower, ranging between ~$400 and $1000. Total 12-month site-based costs equaled $2569 for a single clinic (or $52,381 for 20 clinics). Educational meetings were the most expensive strategy, averaging $1401 per clinic. The site-based costs for the 4 other implementation strategies were markedly lower, ranging between $51 for educational materials and $555 for practice facilitation per clinic. Conclusions: This study provides detailed cost information for implementation strategies used to support evidence-based programs in primary care clinics.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3