Development of Data Quality Indicators for Improving Hospital International Classification of Diseases–Coded Health Data Quality Globally

Author:

Otero-Varela Lucía12,Sandhu Namneet1,Walker Robin L.34,Southern Danielle A.1,Quan Hude123,Eastwood Cathy A.123

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Informatics, Calgary, AB, Canada

2. Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Calgary, AB, Canada

3. Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

4. Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada

Abstract

Background: Hospital inpatient data, coded using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), is widely used to monitor diseases, allocate resources and funding, and evaluate patient outcomes. As such, hospital data quality should be measured before use; however, currently, there is no standard and international approach to assess ICD-coded data quality. Objective: To develop a standardized method for assessing hospital ICD-coded data quality that could be applied across countries: Data quality indicators (DQIs). Research Design: To identify a set of candidate DQIs, we performed an environmental scan, reviewing gray and academic literature on data quality frameworks and existing methods to assess data quality. Indicators from the literature were then appraised and selected through a 3-round Delphi process. The first round involved face-to-face group and individual meetings for idea generation, while the second and third rounds were conducted remotely to collect online ratings. Final DQIs were selected based on the panelists’ quantitative and qualitative feedback. Subjects: Participants included international experts with expertise in administrative health data, data quality, and ICD coding. Results: The resulting 24 DQIs encompass 5 dimensions of data quality: relevance, accuracy and reliability; comparability and coherence; timeliness; and Accessibility and clarity. These will help stakeholders (eg, World Health Organization) to assess hospital data quality using the same standard across countries and highlight areas in need of improvement. Conclusions: This novel area of research will facilitate international comparisons of ICD-coded data quality and be valuable to future studies and initiatives aimed at improving hospital administrative data quality.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference35 articles.

1. An introduction to health care administrative data;Cadarette;Can J Hosp Pharm,2015

2. Administrative health data in Canada: lessons from history;Lucyk;BMC Med Inform Decis Mak,2015

3. Associations between abrupt transition, dialysis-requiring AKI, and early mortality in ESKD among US veterans;Hsu;BMC Nephrol,2023

4. Influence of depression on racial and ethnic disparities in diabetes control;Breland;BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care,2023

5. Validation of the first computerized indicator for orthopaedic surgical site infections in France: ISO-ORTHO;Grammatico-Guillon;Antimicrob Resist Infect Control,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3