Length of Stay Prediction With Standardized Hospital Data From Acute and Emergency Care Using a Deep Neural Network

Author:

Lequertier Vincent12,Wang Tao3,Fondrevelle Julien2,Augusto Vincent4,Polazzi Stéphanie15,Duclos Antoine15

Affiliation:

1. Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, Inserm U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France

2. INSA Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, DISP UR4570, Villeurbanne, France

3. Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, INSA Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, DISP UR4570, Roanne, France

4. Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ. Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, CIS Center, Saint-Etienne, France

5. Department of Health Data, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France

Abstract

Objective: Length of stay (LOS) is an important metric for the organization and scheduling of care activities. This study sought to propose a LOS prediction method based on deep learning using widely available administrative data from acute and emergency care and compare it with other methods. Patients and Methods: All admissions between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019, at 6 university hospitals of the Hospices Civils de Lyon metropolis were included, leading to a cohort of 1,140,100 stays of 515,199 patients. Data included demographics, primary and associated diagnoses, medical procedures, the medical unit, the admission type, socio-economic factors, and temporal information. A model based on embeddings and a Feed-Forward Neural Network (FFNN) was developed to provide fine-grained LOS predictions per hospitalization step. Performances were compared with random forest and logistic regression, with the accuracy, Cohen kappa, and a Bland-Altman plot, through a 5-fold cross-validation. Results: The FFNN achieved an accuracy of 0.944 (CI: 0.937, 0.950) and a kappa of 0.943 (CI: 0.935, 0.950). For the same metrics, random forest yielded 0.574 (CI: 0.573, 0.575) and 0.602 (CI: 0.601, 0.603), respectively, and 0.352 (CI: 0.346, 0.358) and 0.414 (CI: 0.408, 0.422) for the logistic regression. The FFNN had a limit of agreement ranging from −2.73 to 2.67, which was better than random forest (−6.72 to 6.83) or logistic regression (−7.60 to 9.20). Conclusion: The FFNN was better at predicting LOS than random forest or logistic regression. Implementing the FFNN model for routine acute care could be useful for improving the quality of patients’ care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3