Dried Blood Spot Sampling in the Monitoring of Anticancer Therapy for Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review

Author:

Shafiei Mohsen12,Mahmood Alina2,Beale Philip12,Galettis Peter34,Martin Jennifer34,McLachlan Andrew J.5,Blinman Prunella12

Affiliation:

1. Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney ;

2. Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, NSW, 2139 ;

3. Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW; and

4. Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.

5. Sydney Pharmacy School, University of Sydney ;

Abstract

Background: Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a convenient alternative to whole-blood sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that have examined and used DBS sampling for the TDM of chemotherapy and targeted therapy agents for the treatment of patients with solid cancers. Methods: Using the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search of EMBASE and PUBMED was performed to identify eligible clinical studies that used DBS sampling to monitor chemotherapy or targeted therapy for the treatment of solid cancers. Results: Of the 23 eligible studies, 3 measured concordance between drug concentrations determined by DBS and whole-blood, 7 developed analytical methods of DBS, and 13 performed both. DBS was employed for the TDM of everolimus (3 studies), vemurafenib (2 studies), pazopanib (2 studies), abiraterone (2 studies), mitotane, imatinib, adavosertib, capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide, irinotecan, docetaxel, gefitinib, palbociclib/ribociclib, and paclitaxel (one study each). The studies included a median of 14 participants (range: 6–34), with 10–50 μL of blood dispensed on DBS cards (20) and Mitra devices (3). Seventeen of the 20 studies that used DBS found no significant impact of the hematocrit on the accuracy and precision of the developed method in the normal hematocrit ranges (eg, 29.0%–59.0%). DBS and plasma or venous concentrations were highly correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.872–0.999) for all drugs, except mitotane, which did not meet a predefined level of significance (r > 0.872; correlation coefficient, r = 0.87, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: DBS provides an alternative sampling strategy for the TDM of many anticancer drugs. Further research is required to establish a standardized approach for sampling and processing DBS samples to allow future implementation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3