Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges ;
2. INSERM, UMR 1248, 87000, Limoges ; and
3. Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Abstract
Purpose:
Although designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs) constitute a minor part of new psychoactive substances, they deserve the greatest attention because of their popularity among drug users and increasing number and availability. This review covers the effects of different DBZDs, available pharmacological evaluation tools, and their reported toxicity and potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs commonly co-abused with DBZDs.
Methods:
For this narrative review, a nonsystematic search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and PubMed Central databases between June and July 2021.
Results:
The current consensus hypothesis suggests that DBZDs mediate their effects through interactions with the GABAA receptor, producing similar effects to benzodiazepines used in therapy, including sedation, hypnosis, anxiolysis, muscle relaxation, euphoria, amnesia, and addiction. Owing to the complexity of their action mechanism and the numerous GABAA subtype receptors, the pharmacodynamic metrics of DBZDs are very difficult to establish. The pharmacological effects of DBZD are related to their structure, influencing their binding to GABAA receptor subunits. Quantitative structure–activity relationship studies successfully predicted the biological activity and relative potency of DBZD but could not predict the main pharmacological effect of a given DBZD. Exploring the effects by netnographic studies is one of the available alternatives, despite its limitations. DBZDs are usually identified in the context of polysubstance use. Pharmacodynamic interactions between DBZDS and other CNS depressants, such as opioids, have been extensively reported. However, pharmacokinetic interactions between DBZDs and opioids are considered less important, and contradictory conclusions about their clinical significance have been reported.
Conclusions:
Understanding the mechanism of action and other pharmacological metrics is highly important in the clinical management of DBZDs.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献