p53 Abnormal (Copy Number High) Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma Has a Prognosis Indistinguishable From Serous Carcinoma

Abstract

Among the 4 molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma, the p53 abnormal (copy number high) subgroup has the worst prognosis; however, the histologic characteristics of this subgroup are not well established. Also, it is not well established whether low-grade tumors can belong to the p53 abnormal molecular subgroup and if so, what is the prognostic significance of the p53-mutated molecular subgroup in low-grade tumors. In the current study, we included 146 p53-mutated endometrial carcinomas and performed molecular subgrouping either based on a combination of immunohistochemical studies for p53 and MMR protein expression and POLE mutation testing (81 cases) or based on array-based and sequencing-based technologies (65 cases). We excluded cases that belonged to the POLE mutant or MSI molecular subgroups and only studied p53 abnormal (molecular subgroup) endometrial carcinomas (125 cases). In 71 cases, the molecular subgroup was determined by a combination of immunohistochemical studies and POLE mutation testing, and in 54 cases by array-based and sequencing-based methods. We reviewed 1 to 2 representative digital slides from each case and recorded the morphologic characteristics as well as clinical, treatment, and survival follow-up data. Overall, 47 cases were classified as endometrioid carcinoma, 55 serous carcinoma, and 23 other histotypes. Eight cases were FIGO 1, 21 were FIGO 2, and 91 were FIGO 3. A significant proportion of the cases (24.2%) were histologically classified as low-grade (FIGO 1 or 2) endometrioid carcinoma. There was no morphologic characteristic that showed prognostic implication. There was no significant difference in survival among different histotypes (P=0.60). There was no significant difference in survival among low-grade endometrioid (FIGO 1 or 2) versus high-grade (FIGO 3) tumors (P=0.98). Early-stage (stage I), low-grade tumors showed no significant survival advantage over early-stage, high-grade tumors (P=0.16) and this was more evident in FIGO 2 tumors. Although not statistically significant, the FIGO 2 tumors showed a trend toward worse survival than FIGO 3 tumors. Among the cases with available treatment data, more patients with early-stage high-grade tumors received adjuvant treatment, compared to patients with early-stage low-grade tumors, possibly explaining this trend (P=0.03). In conclusion, the findings of our study suggest that low-grade p53 abnormal endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (especially FIGO 2 tumors) have an aggressive course, with a prognosis similar to high-grade tumors. Furthermore, our study suggests that patients who had early-stage low-grade p53 abnormal disease might have been undertreated because of the “low-grade” histotype.