Sleep Disturbance as a Mediator of Lung Cancer Stigma on Psychological Distress and Physical Symptom Burden

Author:

Williamson Timothy J.ORCID,Garon Edward B.,Irwin Michael R.,Choi Alyssa K.,Goldman Jonathan W.,Stanton Annette L.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study tested sleep disturbance as a mediator through which stigma and discrimination predict psychological distress and physical symptom burden in adults with lung cancer. Methods Lung cancer patients on active oncological treatment (N = 108; 74.1% Stage IV) completed questionnaires on lung cancer stigma, sleep, distress, and physical symptoms at study entry and at 6- and 12-week follow-up. Mediation analyses were conducted to investigate whether stigma and discrimination predicted distress and physical symptoms at study entry and across 12 weeks through disrupted sleep. Results Higher discrimination (b = 5.52, 95% CI [2.10, 8.94]) and constrained disclosure (b = 0.45, 95% CI [0.05, 0.85]) were associated significantly with higher sleep disruption at study entry. Sleep disruption, in turn, was associated with higher distress (b = 0.19, 95% CI [0.09, 0.29]) and physical symptoms (b = 0.28, 95% CI [0.17, 0.40]) at study entry. Sleep disruption significantly mediated relationships between higher discrimination and the outcomes of distress (indirect effect = 1.04, 95% CI [0.13, 1.96]) and physical symptoms (indirect effect = 1.58, 95% CI [0.37, 2.79]) at study entry. Sleep disruption also mediated relationships between constrained disclosure and the outcomes of distress (indirect effect = 0.85, 95% CI [<0.01, 0.17]) and physical symptoms (indirect effect = 0.13, 95% CI [0.01, 0.25]). Conclusions Lung cancer patients evidenced pronounced sleep disruption, which mediated relationships between indicators of lung cancer stigma and distress and physical symptoms at study entry. Research is needed to test additional mechanisms through which lung cancer stigma predicts these outcomes longitudinally.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3