Affiliation:
1. University of Iowa, College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa,
2. Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Abstract
ABSTRACT
People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are a vulnerable population who face unique risks of harm when participating in research. Despite a long-standing dialogue, written research codes of ethics, and institutional review board oversight for the conduct of ethical research in vulnerable populations, protections for study populations with OUD is rarely mentioned. Nurse practitioners who conduct research using participants with OUD, especially when recruiting their own patients (i.e., dual role), must be aware of the unique ethical considerations necessary to protect their patients and participants from increased risks. This article explores vulnerabilities and influences that can affect participant recruitment and consent, imbalances in the distribution of risk and benefits to participants participating in research, and the concerns of coercions, undue influence, and unjustifiable pressure contributing to vulnerabilities. Strategies to reduce the risks of influences that are of concern in the vulnerable population of research participants with opioid disorder are suggested. The goal of this article was to raise awareness of the unique potential risks of harm when using people with OUD as research participants and to explore strategies to minimize potential risks of various levels of influence in this vulnerable population.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference16 articles.
1. A transition of power in opioid substitution treatment: Clinic managers' views on the consequences of a patient choice reform;Andersson;Nordisk Alkohol- & Narkotikatidskrift: NAT,2022
2. The issue of consent in research that administers drugs of addiction to addicted persons;Carter;Accountability in Research,2008
3. The impact of stigma on people with opioid use disorder, opioid treatment, and policy;Cheetham;Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation,2022
4. Personal control over decisions to participate in research by persons with histories of both substance use disorders and criminal justice supervision;Chen;Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,2018
5. Vulnerability as a regulatory category in human subject research;Coleman;The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics,2009