Enhancing nurse practitioner research through reflexivity

Author:

Twist Ida12,Montgomery Amy1,Moxham Lorna1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Science, Medicine, and Health—School for Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia,

2. Sydney Children's Hospital Network: The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article highlights the essential role of reflexivity in research, using a qualitative project involving interviews with nurse practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic as an example. It discusses the potential biases inherent in research, particularly when the researcher's experiences closely align with those of the participants. Drawing on the perspective of a nurse practitioner engaged in both research and health care provision, this article explores the importance of reflexivity in addressing these biases. Examining the lead author's experiences conducting interviews with fellow nurse practitioners, the article illustrates how reflexivity was used, particularly in data collection and analysis, to enhance transparency and minimize subjectivity. By advocating for the integration of reflexivity in qualitative research, this article emphasizes the significance of shared experiences between nurse practitioner researchers and participants in reducing biases and improving research outcomes. It demonstrates how reflexivity contributes to a more authentic and comprehensive methodology, especially when researchers share similar experiences with participants. Furthermore, this article offers practical suggestions to assist nurse practitioners in enhancing reflexivity throughout the research process, thereby contributing to ongoing discussion and strategy development in the field.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference24 articles.

1. What do they get out of it? Considering a partnership model in health service research;Askerud;Primary Health Care Research & Development,2021

2. What is qualitative in qualitative research;Aspers;Qualitative Sociology,2019

3. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis;Braun;Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health,2019

4. The importance of reflexivity in qualitative research;Delve;Essential Guide to Coding Qualitative Data,2022

5. Bracketing: A phenomenological theory applied through transpersonal reflexivity;Dörfler;Journal of Organizational Change Management,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3