Understanding factors affecting the integration of geriatric nurse practitioners into health systems

Author:

Porat-Dahlerbruch Joshua123ORCID,Ratz Shoshana2,Aaron Eliana4,Ellen Moriah235

Affiliation:

1. Department of Acute & Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,

2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health Sciences & Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel,

3. Israel Implementation Science and Policy Engagement Centre, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel,

4. EMA Care, Nof Ayalon, Israel,

5. Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Geriatric nurse practitioners (NPs) are introduced into health systems to alleviate provider shortages and improve care for older adults. To achieve these goals, geriatric NPs must be integrated into the health system such that they can efficaciously practice. Internationally, little is known about factors affecting the integration of NPs. Such evidence would improve policymaking and the impact of geriatric NPs on care. In Israel, geriatric NPs were recently introduced. Their ongoing integration is an exemplar for other countries. Purpose: To identify factors affecting the integration of geriatric NPs in Israel and discuss application of these factors in international policy and research. Methodology: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided this qualitative descriptive study. A semistructured interview guide was used to collect data from four professional groups (geriatric NPs, physicians, administrators, and policymakers), which, together, provide a system-level perspective. Factors were identified using deductive content analysis and designated as facilitators, barriers, neutral, or mixed effects. Results: There were 58 participants across the four professional groups. Twenty-eight factors were identified, including patient needs and leadership engagement (facilitators), available information (barrier), culture (mixed), and evidence strength (neutral). Perspectives on several factors differed by the professional group's role in integrating NPs (e.g., costs). Conclusions: The barriers highlight lacking interprofessional support from a priori policymaking and communication breakdowns. Policies should reflect priorities of administrators, clinicians, and policymakers. Implications: These factors may inform policymaking in other countries but would be most effective if based on country-specific research. This implementation science approach may inform future studies.

Funder

U.S.-Israel Fulbright Commission

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing,General Medicine,General Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3