Performance and Interpretation of Lung Scintigraphy

Author:

Le Pennec Romain1,Schaefer Wolfgang2,Tulchinsky Mark3,Lamoureux François4,Roach Paul5,Rischpler Christoph6,Zukotynski Katherine7,O’Brien Christopher8,Murphy Declan5,Pascal Pierre9,Le Gal Grégoire10,Salaun Pierre-Yves1,Le Roux Pierre-Yves1

Affiliation:

1. Univ Brest, CHU Brest, Médecine Nucléaire, GETBO, UMR1304, Brest, France

2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Maria Hilf Hospital, Mönchengladbach, Germany

3. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Penn State University, Hershey, PA

4. Hôpital de Val D'Or, Val D'Or, Quebec, Canada

5. Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia

6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

7. Departments of Radiology and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

8. Nuclear Medicine, Brantford General Hospital, Brantford, Ontario, Canada

9. Médecine Nucléaire, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France

10. Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Purpose Although ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy is a widely used imaging test, different options are possible for the acquisition and interpretation of the scan. The aim of this study was to assess current practices regarding the use and interpretation of lung scintigraphy in various clinical indications. Patients and Methods An online survey comprising 25 questions was sent to nuclear medicine departments in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, and United States between 2022 and 2023. A single response per department was consolidated. Results Four hundred nineteen responses were collected (Australia: 32, Canada: 58, France: 149, Germany: 92, and United States: 88). For acute pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis, 82.8% of centers reported using SPECT acquisitions (Australia: 93.3%, Canada: 91.8%, France: 99.2%, Germany: 96.2%, and United States: 32.1%). Among them, SPECT images were combined with a CT scan in 70.5% of centers. A total of 10.6% of centers reported not using ventilation for acute PE diagnosis. SPECT acquisition was used in 97.8% of centers using 99mTc carbon particles, 97.1% 81mKr gas, 58.7% 99mTc-DTPA, and 19.4% 133Xe gas, respectively. For V/Q SPECT interpretation, the EANM criteria were used in 65.0% of departments. A very wide variety of practices were observed in pregnant women and in COVID-19 patients. SPECT acquisition was widely used in the follow-up of PE and for the screening of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (>90% of centers), with inconsistency regarding the interpretation of matched perfusion defects in this setting. Conclusions This survey shows the strong adoption of SPECT in the various clinical indications of lung scintigraphy, except in the United States, where planar imaging is still mostly used. The survey also shows variability in interpretation criteria both for PE diagnosis and screening for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, highlighting the need for further standardizations of practices.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3