1. The genetics panel of the NAS BEAR I Committee (1956): epistolary evidence suggests self-interest may have prompted an exaggeration of radiation risks that led to the adoption of the LNT cancer risk assessment model. Arch Toxicol. Published online: 04 July 2014.;Calabrese;DOI,10
2. An abuse of risk assessment: how regulatory agencies improperly adopted LNT for cancer risk assessment. Arch Toxicol. Published online: 18 January 2015.;Calabrese;DOI,10
3. Cancer risk assessment foundation unraveling: new historical evidence reveals that the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (US NAS), Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation (BEAR) Committee Genetics Panel falsified the research record to promote acceptance of the LNT. Arch Toxicol. Published online: 20 January 2015.;Calabrese;DOI,10
4. Problems of U.S. policy on radiation protection.;Jaworowski;EIR Science and Technology,2003
5. Remedy for radiation feardiscard the politicized science.;Cutler;Dose Response,2014