Affiliation:
1. Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital
Abstract
Aim
This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capabilities of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging in staging gastric carcinoma, exploring the impact of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on treatment planning and its prognostic significance.
Methods
The research included 31 patients undergoing staging for gastric cancer, who received both 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans. We compared the SUVmax and SUVmean of the primary tumor and lymph nodes, the count of organ metastases, tumor-to-background ratios, and overall staging accuracy. Additionally, the study evaluated radiological progression-free survival and overall survival rates.
Results
The 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated superior efficacy in identifying the primary tumor compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, particularly in cases of poorly cohesive, signet-ring cell, and mucinous subtypes, with detection rates of 96.7% versus 77.4% (P = 0.006 and P = 0.008, respectively). Analysis of lymph nodes showed a significantly higher detection of positive nodes with 68Ga-FAPI-04 (P = 0.026), although no significant differences were observed in SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio on a patient basis (P > 0.05). SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratios for peritoneal involvement were notably higher with 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT (P = 0.04 for both). No significant differences were found in the detection of organ metastases and disease stage between the 2 imaging modalities (P > 0.05). Primary tumor uptake did not significantly impact radiological progression-free survival or overall survival in either modality.
Conclusions
68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging surpasses 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting the primary tumor, especially in poorly cohesive and signet-ring cell gastric cancer types, and offers improved accuracy in disease staging. This indicates its potential to enhance treatment management and prognostic assessment in gastric cancer patients.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献