Comparison of Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone and Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal for 131I Therapy in Patients With Intermediate- to High-Risk Thyroid Cancer

Author:

Park Sohyun1,Bang Ji-In2,Kim Keunyoung3,Seo Youngduk4,Chong Ari5,Hong Chae Moon6,Lee Dong-Eun7,Choi Miyoung8,Lee Sang-Woo9,Oh So Won10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang

2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea

3. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital and School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Pusan

4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong

5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chosun University Hospital and College of Medicine, Gwangju

6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu

7. Biostatistics Collaboration Team, National Cancer Center, Goyang

8. Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul

9. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine and Chilgok Hospital, Daegu

10. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

Abstract

Background This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and advantages associated with the use of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) for radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy in patients with intermediate- to high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. Patients and Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant articles reporting clinical outcomes of rhTSH compared with thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) in patients with intermediate- to high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer published between January 2012 and June 2023. Meta-analyses were performed (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022340915) to assess the success rate of radioiodine remnant ablation (RRA) in patients with intermediate to high risk and determine the disease control rate among patients with distant metastases, evaluated using the RECIST criteria. Results Thirteen studies involving 1858 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analyses revealed significantly higher overall RRA success rate in the rhTSH group compared with the THW group, with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.25). However, in the subgroup analysis of high-risk patients, pooled analyses showed no significant differences in RRA success rate between the rhTSH group compared with the THW group with a pooled RR of 1.05 (95% CI, 0.88–1.24). In patients with distant metastases, there were no significant differences in the disease control rate between groups, with a pooled RR of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.78–1.44). Conclusions rhTSH for RAI therapy is a practical option for RAI therapy in patients with intermediate- to high-risk thyroid cancer, including those with distant metastases.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3